Tennessee Senate Bill SB2972

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24
• Passed: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Chapter 148 of the Private Acts of 1986; as amended by Chapter 2 of the Private Acts of 2013; and any other acts amendatory thereto, relative to Carroll County roads and highways.

Impact

The bill mandates that the Highway Supervisor be elected by the citizens of Carroll County during the general election in August 2026, and subsequently every four years. The provisions established by the bill not only create a formal structure for highway leadership in the county but also outline the supervisor's qualifications, term, and responsibilities. Furthermore, the legislation necessitates a two-thirds approval from Carroll County's legislative body for it to take effect, which places emphasis on local legislative collaboration for significant administrative changes.

Summary

SB2972 aims to amend specific provisions of the Private Acts of 1986 and 2013, pertaining to Carroll County's roads and highways. A significant aspect of the bill is the establishment of the Office of Highway Supervisor, which will serve as the Chief Administrative Officer under the Tennessee County Uniform Highway Law. This change underscores the state's commitment to optimizing local governance by making provisions for the management and oversight of county highways.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment around SB2972 appears to be supportive within local governance discussions. Proponents see the bill as empowering local citizens by granting them the ability to elect their Highway Supervisor, which aligns with themes of democratic participation and local control. Nonetheless, the requirement of a two-thirds vote for the bill's approval implies there may be some divisions or concerns regarding its potential implications on local administrative dynamics.

Contention

Despite the seemingly positive outlook, there may be points of contention regarding the bill's impact compared to previous administrative practices. The shift from appointed to elected leadership could raise questions about the effectiveness and accountability of the role. Additionally, existing Highway Supervisors may have concerns about transitioning authority and how this could affect ongoing projects or relationships with the state. This change could essentially redefine local governance structures in terms of highway administration, provoking dialogue about best practices moving forward.