California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1024

Introduced
2/6/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Refer
3/14/24  
Refer
3/14/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Engrossed
4/11/24  
Engrossed
4/11/24  
Refer
4/29/24  
Refer
5/20/24  
Refer
5/20/24  
Report Pass
6/11/24  
Refer
6/11/24  
Refer
6/11/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Enrolled
7/3/24  
Enrolled
7/3/24  
Chaptered
7/18/24  
Chaptered
7/18/24  

Caption

Healing arts: Board of Behavioral Sciences: licensees and registrants.

Impact

The bill revises the terminology regarding supervision, replacing the term 'supervisee' with 'person receiving supervision' and modifies the regulations around clinical training. One key aspect of the bill is the adjustment of requirements for direct supervisor contact, limiting supervisors to oversee no more than six persons simultaneously in nonexempt settings. This change is intended to streamline supervision processes and ensure that clinical trainees receive adequate guidance in their practice.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 1024, authored by Ochoa Bogh, introduces significant amendments to existing laws governing the Board of Behavioral Sciences, which includes the Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist Act, the Educational Psychologist Practice Act, the Clinical Social Worker Practice Act, and the Licensed Professional Clinical Counselor Act. The bill mandates that licensees or registrants display their licenses visibly in their practice locations and requires them to provide clients with specific written notices detailing the board's role in addressing service complaints, starting July 1, 2025.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1024 appears to be characterized by professional support from the mental health community, which views these amendments as enhancing regulation and oversight of clinical practices. However, there may be concerns regarding the practical implications of limiting supervisor capacities, which could impact the availability of mentorship for aspiring therapists. The bill has gained unanimous support, which reflects a broad consensus among lawmakers on the need for these regulatory reforms.

Contention

While the overall reception of SB 1024 has been positive, there are notable points of contention regarding the approach to supervisory limits and notification requirements. Critics may argue that increased paperwork and mandatory notifications can add unnecessary bureaucratic overhead for therapists, particularly those in smaller practices or less populated regions. The bill, however, asserts that these requirements will enhance transparency and accountability in the behavioral health sector, ultimately serving client interests more effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB690

Marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors.

CA AB2363

Marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors.

CA AB1758

Board of Behavioral Sciences: marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors: supervision of applicants for licensure via videoconferencing.

CA AB93

Healing arts: marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors: required experience and supervision.

CA SB775

Board of Psychology and Board of Behavioral Sciences.

CA AB456

Healing arts: associate clinical social workers.