Relative to the uses of education trust fund.
One significant effect of HB440 is that it allows the Department of Education to retain up to 1% of the total fund appropriation for administering the programs funded by the ETF. The expected financial implications, as outlined in the bill, indicate an increase in state expenditures of approximately $10.6 million for FY2023, gradually increasing in the following fiscal years. However, while the bill does not amend the main sources of ETF funding, it does risk necessitating transfers from the state’s general fund if expenditures exceed available ETF resources, especially during years when budgets are tight.
House Bill 440 (HB440) seeks to revise the allowable uses for funds deposited in the Education Trust Fund (ETF). This amendment will enable the state treasurer to utilize these funds for a variety of educational purposes, including adequate education grants for school districts, charter school support, public school infrastructure grants, and other educational initiatives. With this bill, various types of grants will be created or expanded to support educational needs throughout the state, addressing both school districts and approved charter public schools.
Overall, HB440 presents significant changes to the administration and utilization of the Education Trust Fund, with potential implications for educational adequacy and equity within the state. As discussions continue around this bill, legislators and stakeholders will likely assess its long-term impact on educational funding and the associated economic considerations.
The bill has already faced some contention, primarily centered around its fiscal management and the appropriateness of expanding the ETF's uses without direct increases in funding sources. Critics may argue that allowing the Department of Education to allocate additional administrative funds could detract from direct educational spending. Furthermore, concerns may arise about the sustainability of funding levels in the Education Trust Fund, especially given that if the ETF balance were to dip into negative territory, state general funds would have to compensate.