Kansas Senate Bill SB92

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/23
• Refer: 1/25/23
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Creating a procedure for appointment of delegates to a convention of the states under Article V of the Constitution of the United States and prescribing the duties and responsibilities of such delegates.

Impact

The bill will impact the state's approach toward constitutional amendments, potentially influencing the legislative process surrounding how Kansas engages with national constitutional discussions. It centralizes the selection and instruction of delegates within the state legislature, suggesting a streamlined approach to representation at the national level. Additionally, by outlining the conditions under which delegates can vote and participate, SB92 reinforces legislative oversight on how the state's voice is represented in these significant national conversations.

Summary

Senate Bill 92 establishes a framework for the appointment and responsibilities of delegates representing Kansas at a potential Article V convention. This convention is called under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, allowing states to propose amendments to the Constitution. The bill details the appointment process for delegates and alternate delegates, their qualifications, and the duties they are expected to fulfill once convened. Notably, the bill mandates that a joint committee is formed to oversee communications between the appointed delegates and the state legislature, ensuring that delegation aligns with state interests and instructions.

Contention

One point of contention surrounding SB92 relates to the centralized power it grants the Kansas legislature in terms of selecting and managing delegates. Critics may express concern that this concentration of power could limit the voices and options presented at an Article V convention, potentially overlooking broader public sentiments. Furthermore, the bill explicitly prevents delegates from voting on unauthorized amendments and stipulates that any deviation from set instructions could lead to dismissal, raising questions about the flexibility and responsiveness of the delegates once appointed.