Maryland Senate Bill SB232

Maryland 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Introduced: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/8/25

Caption

Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards - Restoration and Receipt of Benefits and Use at Automated Teller Machines

Impact

If enacted, SB232 would significantly alter the existing framework surrounding EBT cards and the management of benefits distributed through them. It would enforce provisions to streamline the process for beneficiaries to reclaim lost benefits and alleviate the burden of navigating red tape in instances of fraud. The bill would also require automated teller machines to be equipped to process EBT transactions, thus expanding access to beneficiaries in accessing their funds. Together, these measures could reinforce financial security for vulnerable populations who rely on these benefits.

Summary

Senate Bill 232 aims to enhance the protection of beneficiaries using Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) cards by requiring the Maryland Department of Human Services (DHS) to automatically restore benefits that have been lost due to fraudulent use of EBT cards. The bill stipulates that beneficiaries should not have to take any further action to recover their lost benefits and mandates that the DHS processes these restorations in a timely manner. Additionally, the bill sets deadlines for beneficiaries to report fraudulent activity and claims for reimbursement, ensuring that those impacted can quickly regain access to their benefits.

Contention

While the bill presents various safeguards for beneficiaries, some points of contention may arise regarding the Department's capacity to effectively manage the increased responsibility of monitoring and restoring benefits. Critics might argue that without the requirement for households to substantiate claims with police reports, there could be an increased risk of fraudulent claims from individuals attempting to take advantage of the system. Discussions regarding the funding mechanism for these restorations may also surface, considering that any benefits restored are subject to state budget limitations, raising concerns about sustainability and fiscal responsibility.