Relating to the confidentiality of certain information for employees of a county courthouse or the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System and the employees' family members.
If enacted, SB1367 would amend various sections of Texas law to align with its purpose of protecting the privacy of court employees and their families. The changes would facilitate a system whereby employees can indicate their confidentiality preferences using mechanisms similar to those currently available to judges. This act would not only curtail potential risks to these employees but also affect how personal information is handled within governmental databases, particularly regarding disclosures in public records.
Senate Bill 1367 addresses the confidentiality of certain personal information for employees of county courthouses and the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System, as well as their family members. The bill aims to establish protective measures ensuring that the residential addresses and other identifying information of these employees are kept confidential and not publicly disclosed. This legislation builds upon previous provisions introduced in Senate Bill 42 from the 85th regular session, thus enhancing the safety and security of those who work in court settings.
The general sentiment surrounding SB1367 has been largely supportive, with lawmakers recognizing the importance of protecting those who serve in the judicial system. Proponents argue that confidentiality is critical for the safety of court employees, given the potential risks associated with their work. However, some discussions suggested the need for a balance between transparency in government operations and the privacy of individuals working within sensitive environments.
While the bill saw overwhelming support during the voting process, debates centered around the implications of further confidentiality measures on public transparency. Critics, although not prevalent, raised concerns that excessive secrecy could hinder public access to information and accountability within the judicial system. They argued for the necessity of ensuring that protective measures do not compromise the foundational principles of open government.
Election Code
Government Code
Tax Code
Transportation Code