Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB71

Introduced
12/12/24  
Refer
12/20/24  
Engrossed
1/31/25  
Refer
2/4/25  

Caption

Revise special license requirements allowing second lion license and removing Tendoy sheep reporting

Impact

If enacted, HB71 would amend existing state laws related to healthcare funding and insurance coverage. The proposal includes provisions for increased funding for healthcare programs aimed at low-income families, which may lead to more comprehensive coverage options and reduced out-of-pocket expenses. The bill is expected to have a positive impact on healthcare institutions by potentially increasing patient volumes as more individuals gain access to medical services they previously could not afford.

Summary

House Bill 71 is designed to enhance access to healthcare services for low-income individuals by providing financial assistance for medical services and insurance coverage. The bill aims to address the increasing disparities in healthcare access, particularly for populations that are economically disadvantaged. Supporters of the bill argue that it represents a significant step toward improving public health by ensuring that vulnerable groups have access to necessary medical services without facing prohibitive costs.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB71 appears to be positive among advocates and healthcare organizations. Many view the bill as an essential measure to combat healthcare disparities and improve the quality of life for low-income residents. However, there are concerns about the sustainability of funding and the potential burden on state resources. Critics argue that while the intentions behind the bill are commendable, the execution may face challenges that could undermine its effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB71 involves the approach to funding the proposed measures. While supporters advocate for increased government spending on healthcare, detractors voice concerns about the long-term financial implications and raise questions about whether such funding could lead to cuts in other essential services. Furthermore, stakeholders have debated the scope of the bill, particularly regarding which services should qualify for assistance, leading to discussions about the priorities that the state should establish in its healthcare funding strategy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT HB456

Revise FWP super tag program laws

MT HB521

Revising laws related to conservation licenses on state lands

MT SB525

Generally revise laws related to hunting licenses and permits

MT HB932

Revise funeral services licensing and death certificate reporting laws

MT SB84

Revise laws related to hunting and aircraft use

MT SB139

Revise non resident license laws related to harvesting mountain lions

MT SB520

Generally revise hunting license laws

MT HB627

Revise wolf trapping laws

MT HB628

Revise wolf trapping laws

MT HB101

Revise licensing reciprocity for behavioral health care licensees

Similar Bills

CA ACR152

California Mountain Biking Month.

CA SB818

Mountain Lions: human-mountain lion conflicts program: scientific research: County of El Dorado.

CA SR112

Relative to the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area

CA AB8

Mountain lions: depredation permits.

WV SB595

Creating Mountain Bike Responsibility Act

VT S0074

An act relating to incremental implementation of Green Mountain Care

VT H0433

An act relating to incremental implementation of Green Mountain Care

WV HB2707

Creating the Mountain Bike Responsibility Act