North Dakota Senate Bill SB2117

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/7/25
• Refer: 1/7/25
• Report Pass: 1/20/25
• Engrossed: 1/23/25
• Refer: 2/13/25
• Report Pass: 3/28/25
• Enrolled: 4/15/25
• Passed: 4/18/25

Caption

Abandoned surface mine reclamation.

Impact

The bill has significant implications for state laws concerning environmental protection and public health. It establishes a state abandoned mine reclamation fund, which will include revenue from various sources, such as federal funds, donations, and recovery of costs associated with reclamation projects. The funds will be utilized to cover expenses related to the reclamation of affected areas, including the treatment of water pollution and restoration of public facilities. Such measures are crucial not only for environmental sustainability but also for safeguarding public health by mitigating hazards associated with abandoned mining sites.

Summary

Senate Bill 2117 seeks to amend sections of the North Dakota Century Code related to the reclamation of abandoned surface mines. The bill aims to establish a more structured plan for the reclamation of lands and water resources that were adversely affected by past coal mining and noncoal mining practices. This includes provisions for the identification of reclamation areas and the development of funding sources for the reclamation process. By outlining specific criteria for the reclamation projects, SB2117 intends to streamline efforts towards restoring ecosystems impacted by mining activities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB2117 appears to be positive among legislators, as it passed unanimously in both the Senate and the House, with yeas of 46 and 89 respectively. The backing from multiple stakeholders suggests a collective recognition of the need for better management of abandoned mines and an acknowledgment of the environmental responsibilities that come with historical mining practices. Nevertheless, there may be concerns among some community members or environmental groups regarding the adequacy of funding and the execution of reclamation plans.

Contention

Despite the strong support for the bill, notable points of contention may arise concerning the prioritization of reclamation projects and the transparency of the fund management. Critics may argue about the effectiveness of the proposed amendments in ensuring that priority is given to the most severely impacted areas and that adequate inspections and oversight mechanisms are in place for designated projects. Additionally, while the bill aims to lay down a strong foundation for reclamation efforts, there may be apprehension about whether the available funding will be sufficient to achieve the intended outcomes.