Texas Senate Bill SB1270

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the eligibility of certain events to receive funding through the Major Events Reimbursement Program.

Impact

The modifications proposed in SB 1270 aim to refine the eligibility process for events seeking financial support, thereby potentially enhancing the state's capacity to host prestigious occurrences. The bill stipulates that funding is contingent upon an event yielding significant increases in tax receipts—specifically, an increase of at least $1 million. It also requires that site selection organizations consider competitive options beyond Texas to ensure that the hosting state is chosen based on merit, rather than default. Notably, events must also submit a human trafficking prevention plan to relevant authorities prior to funding approval.

Summary

Senate Bill 1270 relates to the eligibility criteria for receiving funding through the Major Events Reimbursement Program in Texas. The bill amends certain definitions and requirements within the existing framework, specifically expanding the list of events that can qualify for public funding. This includes major sporting events like the Super Bowl, NCAA championship games, and the World Cup, among others. The intent is to attract large-scale events to the state, which proponents argue can bolster Texas's economy through increased tourism and spending.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 1270 is largely positive among business and tourism stakeholders, who see the potential for substantial economic benefits from hosting major events. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the emphasis on large-scale events at the possible expense of smaller, community-based festivals that offer cultural value and local support. This reflects a tension between prioritizing high-profile, commercially lucrative events versus supporting grassroots initiatives that empower local communities.

Contention

While the bill enjoys backing from commercial and tourism advocates, it does attract some contention. Critics question whether the funding for these high-cost events is justified given the state's other pressing financial needs. Additionally, the requirement for human trafficking plans indicates an awareness of social issues connected to large gatherings, but some argue that placing this burden solely on event organizers may be insufficient to tackle the underlying problems of trafficking effectively.