Texas Senate Bill SB1568

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to organized election fraud activity; imposing a civil penalty.

Impact

The bill's impact is significant as it creates a legal structure that empowers the Texas Attorney General to pursue civil remedies against individuals participating in organized election fraud. A civil penalty of $1,000 is imposed for each offense, which can be pursued in any Texas county where part of the fraudulent activity occurred. This means that individuals engaging in election fraud could face substantial financial consequences, which proponents argue will help to ensure fairer elections. The law applies only to offenses committed after its effective date, September 1, 2019.

Summary

SB1568 aims to address organized election fraud activity in Texas by imposing civil penalties on individuals found liable for engaging in such activities. Specifically, the bill amends Chapter 276 of the Texas Election Code, introducing new provisions that define 'organized election fraud activity' and establish a framework for civil actions against those participating in such illegal conduct. The anticipation is that this framework will deter fraudulent activities associated with elections, thereby enhancing the integrity of the electoral process in the state.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB1568 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who view it as a necessary step to protect the electoral process. Many legislators believe that establishing penalties for organized election fraud will not only deter potential offenders but also enhance public trust in election outcomes. However, critics of the bill argue that such measures can potentially lead to overreach and the targeting of individuals without sufficient evidence, which might limit voter participation or infringe upon civil rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the definitions within the bill and the potential for misuse of the civil penalties. Some members of the legislature expressed concerns that the broad terms used could lead to disproportionate penalties being applied to individuals who may be falsely accused of engaging in election fraud. Additionally, there are worries that such legislation could disproportionately affect marginalized communities, particularly if allegations of fraud are more frequently levied against them, impacting their ability to participate in the electoral process.