Relating to the prosecution of the criminal offense of passing a school bus; increasing a criminal penalty.
Impact
The amendment to Section 545.066 of the Transportation Code effectively strengthens legal repercussions for neglecting school bus safety protocols. By establishing stricter penalties, HB 4070 aims to enhance public awareness of the dangers associated with passing a stopped school bus, thereby fostering greater accountability among drivers. As this bill is implemented, it is anticipated to contribute positively to children's safety on the roads, particularly during school hours. The law only applies to offenses committed on or after its effective date of September 1, 2019, meaning past infractions will be adjudicated under previous statutes.
Summary
House Bill 4070 addresses the prosecution of the criminal offense of passing a stopped school bus in Texas. The bill proposes to enhance the penalties associated with this offense, significantly increasing the fines imposed on individuals who violate the law. Specifically, it raises the penalty for a first-time offense to a fine between $500 and $1,250. Furthermore, if an individual is convicted of a subsequent offense within five years, the penalty increases to a fine ranging from $1,000 to $2,000, escalating to a third-degree felony if serious bodily injury results from the violation. This increased punitive measure is designed to deter dangerous driving behaviors in school zones, particularly when school buses are stopped to load or unload children.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 4070 appears to be largely supportive, as stakeholders, including legislators and advocacy groups concerned with child safety, have expressed backing for stronger measures related to school bus safety. The emphasis on public safety resonates with the community's desire to reduce accidents and ensure the protection of children. However, there may be some divergent opinions on the appropriateness of the punitive measures, with concerns about the potential impacts on drivers who may inadvertently violate the law.
Contention
Despite broad support for the bill, there remains some contention regarding the severity of penalties and their implications for drivers. Critics argue that while the intention to protect children is commendable, the increased fines and potential criminal charges could disproportionately impact low-income individuals or those who might have committed minor infractions. Additionally, questions arise about the enforcement of these penalties and whether increased prosecution truly correlates with improved safety outcomes for school children. The balance between enforcing stricter laws and maintaining fairness in enforcement continues to be a relevant discussion point in legislative circles.
Relating to the prosecution and punishment of certain criminal offenses involving the smuggling of persons or the operation of a stash house; increasing criminal penalties.
Relating to the designation of fentanyl poisoning for purposes of the death certificate and to the criminal penalties for certain controlled substance offenses; increasing a criminal penalty.
Relating to catalytic converters, including criminal conduct involving catalytic converters; providing an administrative penalty; creating a criminal offense; increasing a criminal penalty; increasing a fee.
Relating to the prosecution of and punishment for the criminal offense of hindering the investigation or prosecution of certain sexual offenses committed against a child; increasing criminal penalties.
Relating to catalytic converters, including criminal conduct involving catalytic converters; providing an administrative penalty; creating a criminal offense; increasing a criminal penalty; increasing a fee.