Texas House Bill HB166

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to restrictions on the age of persons employed by or allowed on the premises of a sexually oriented business; creating a criminal offense.

Impact

The implications of HB 166 are significant in terms of state law surrounding both alcohol and business regulation. The bill amends existing statutes to clearly define the obligations of sexually oriented businesses regarding the age of their patrons and employees, thereby creating a criminal offense for those who breach these stipulations. This change underscores an effort to enhance the safety and welfare of minors by restricting their exposure to environments deemed inappropriate. By creating strict penalties for violations, the legislature aims to ensure compliance among such establishments operating within Texas.

Summary

House Bill 166 aims to implement strict age restrictions concerning employment and presence in sexually oriented businesses in Texas. The bill specifically prohibits individuals under the age of 21 from entering these establishments. It establishes a new section within the Alcoholic Beverage Code that enforces penalties for businesses that knowingly allow minors on their premises, including license suspensions and cancellations for repeated violations. The Attorney General or local authorities are empowered to take legal action against those who violate these conditions, establishing a legislative framework that prioritizes the protection of minors from adult environments.

Contention

While proponents advocate for the bill as a necessary measure to protect children from potential harm, critics may argue that it could unintentionally impact legal adult activities within the sexually oriented business sector. Concerns regarding individual freedoms and the economic effects on these businesses have been raised, particularly about whether these restrictions might lead to broader implications for business operations or unfairly impede adult enjoyment of legally regulated venues. The balance between protecting minors and preserving individual freedoms is likely to remain a point of contention in legislative discussions surrounding the bill.