Texas Senate Bill SB77

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to discrimination on the basis of hair texture or protective hairstyle associated with race.

Impact

The impact of SB77 would be significant as it extends protections against racial discrimination to include hair texture and styles historically related to race. By explicitly including these definitions in both education and labor statutes, the bill aims to prevent institutions from enforcing policies that could disproportionately affect individuals of certain racial backgrounds, particularly Black individuals. This legislative change would align Texas state laws more closely with contemporary views on diversity and inclusion in appearance standards, particularly in educational and professional settings.

Summary

SB77 is a legislative bill that aims to prohibit discrimination based on hair texture and protective hairstyles commonly associated with race. Specifically, the bill seeks to amend various sections of the Education Code and Labor Code to ensure that student dress codes in public schools and institutions of higher education, as well as workplace grooming policies, do not discriminate against individuals based on their hair texture or protective hairstyles, including braids, locks, and twists. This move is intended to foster an inclusive environment for students and employees by safeguarding their cultural identity and expression regarding hair.

Contention

Supporters of SB77 argue that it addresses a critical issue of cultural expression and fairness, asserting that such discrimination can lead to negative psychological effects and outcomes for those affected. They view the bill as a necessary legal framework that empowers individuals to express their cultural identity without fear of repercussion or discriminatory treatment. Conversely, opponents may raise concerns regarding the potential for ambiguity in how these definitions are applied or interpreted within existing policies, possibly leading to disputes about enforcement and compliance. Thus, the discussion surrounding this bill may involve differing opinions on the balance between maintaining professional standards and accommodating cultural practices.