Relating to the civil penalty for certain signs placed on the right-of-way of a public road.
Impact
The proposed changes are intended to deter the unauthorized placement of signs, thus maintaining the aesthetics of public roadways and ensuring safety. By raising the financial repercussions for violations, legislators aim to discourage commercial interests from disregarding state regulations on roadside advertising. The amendments reflect a broader commitment to uphold public standards and orderly traffic environments across Texas. The enforcement mechanism allows district, county, or municipal attorneys to sue for collection of penalties, enhancing local authority in regulatory enforcement.
Summary
SB355 relates to the civil penalties imposed for placing certain signs on the right-of-way of public roads. The bill amends provisions of the Transportation Code, increasing the penalties for unauthorized signage. Under the new law, individuals who place, commission, or advertise on signs in violation of established regulations could face fines that escalates with repeat offenses. The penalties are set at a maximum of $1,000 for the first violation, $2,500 for a second violation, and $5,000 for any subsequent violations. This act is effective starting September 1, 2021.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB355 appears generally supportive among legislators who emphasize the importance of maintaining public space and the safety of motorists. Proponents argue that by imposing stricter penalties, the state can better uphold highway standards. However, there may be objections based on concerns about over-regulation or the impact on small businesses that rely on inexpensive signage for visibility. Overall, the legislative discussions suggest a focus on community welfare over the interests of businesses advertising along thoroughfares.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise from concerns regarding the strictness of penalties and the potential for increased bureaucratic involvement in minor signage disputes. Critics could argue that while the intent is to regulate public space, the enhanced penalties might disproportionately affect small businesses or individuals who unintentionally violate signage laws. The discussion around these penalties could spark debates about local autonomy in managing public spaces versus state-imposed standards.
Relating to the regulation of certain health professionals and health facilities; providing civil and administrative penalties; creating a criminal offense.
Relating to restrictions on the use and disclosure of certain genetic material and genetic information; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.
Relating to the publication of certain photographs of human remains by certain individuals for a purpose other than an authorized purpose; providing a civil penalty.