Texas House Bill HB1702

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to lobbying by former members of the legislature; creating a criminal offense.

Impact

The impact of HB 1702 is multifaceted. Primary among its implications is the introduction of a Class A misdemeanor for any former legislator who attempts to engage in lobbying activities before the conclusion of the second regular session following their departure from the legislature. This shift establishes a legal framework that further encumbers the capacity of former lawmakers to participate in lobbying, thereby aiming to enhance the transparency of governmental processes. In practical terms, such rules would likely discourage potential conflicts of interest and promote a culture of accountability among former public servants.

Summary

House Bill 1702 is a legislative proposal aimed at regulating lobbying activities by former members of the legislature in Texas. The bill specifically amends the Government Code to create restrictions on former legislators concerning their lobbying activities. It seeks to establish a clear boundary around when and how former members can engage with current legislators or members of the executive branch, particularly in relation to influencing legislation and administrative actions. If enacted, this bill would represent a significant shift in how lobbying is governed in Texas, especially with respect to former officials who may seek to leverage their past positions for influence after leaving office.

Contention

While supporters may argue that restricting lobbying by former legislators promotes integrity within the legislative process, opponents could raise concerns regarding the limitations placed on the ability of individuals to actively engage in advocacy on behalf of beneficial causes, particularly when representing non-profits or marginalized groups. The bill includes provisions that allow exceptions for certain individuals, like former legislators advocating for low-income individuals or those with disabilities, but critics may argue that the definitions could be restrictive or vague. Ultimately, the contours of this bill reflect ongoing tensions between enhancing political accountability and maintaining open channels for public advocacy.