Texas Senate Bill SCR24

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Granting the legislature permission to adjourn for more than three days during the period beginning on Wednesday, March 10, 2021, and ending on Tuesday, March 16, 2021.

Impact

The passage of SCR24 signifies the legislature's ability to manage its own schedule flexibly, which is especially relevant during periods that may include holidays or other significant events. By temporarily lifting the adjournment limit, the legislature can ensure that they are able to complete pressing legislative business without the constraints of the usual three-day limit. This adjustment can help maintain momentum on important bills and resolutions, particularly those that may have significant implications for state governance or resources.

Summary

SCR24 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that grants the Texas legislature permission to adjourn for more than three days during a specified period from March 10, 2021, to March 16, 2021. This resolution is rooted in Section 17, Article III of the Texas Constitution, which typically prevents either house of the legislature from adjourning for more than three days without agreement from the other house. This measure was introduced to allow for necessary continuity in legislative business during the stated timeframe.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SCR24 appeared to be largely supportive within the legislature. The resolution was passed with broad bipartisan support; it received 31 votes in favor in the Senate and largely positive feedback in the House with 130 votes for and only 10 against. This indicates a general consensus among legislators about the necessity of this measure, highlighting a prioritization of legislative efficiency and responsiveness.

Contention

Although SCR24 faced some opposition indicated by the 10 votes against it in the House, the overall debate did not appear to spark significant contention among key stakeholders. Critics may regard any relaxation of constitutional provisions with caution, concerned about the implications of adjourning without oversight. However, the overwhelming support signifies that the benefits of adhering to legislative demands outweighed potential concerns regarding governance.