Texas House Bill HB3607

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 86th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.

Impact

The enactment of HB3607 will have a significant influence on the state laws by clarifying and correcting statutes impacted by previous legislative sessions. This includes aligning terminologies and references to other laws passed by the 86th Legislature. This bill does not alter existing legal rights or obligations, but rather focuses on refining the presentation and accuracy of the state's statutory corpus. As a result, legal practitioners and policymakers will likely find it easier to navigate the legislation, thereby enhancing compliance and enforcement of laws.

Summary

House Bill 3607 primarily addresses nonsubstantive additions, revisions, and corrections to the enacted codes of Texas. The bill's purpose centers on ensuring that various laws already enacted by the Texas legislature are accurately reflected in codifications and that omissions or discrepancies are corrected. By doing so, the lawmakers aim to streamline the legal framework, making it more coherent and accessible to those who rely on it, including legal practitioners, businesses, and citizens. This bill represents a systematic approach to maintaining legislative clarity and consistency throughout state law.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB3607 appears to be largely supportive, as evidenced by the unanimous support it received in both the House and Senate votes. Legislators recognize the importance of keeping the legal framework organized and error-free. However, discussions may also reflect some concerns about the repetitiveness of such revision bills, with critics potentially questioning the need for frequent updates to laws that do not substantively change legal content. Nonetheless, the general view is that these corrections serve a valuable purpose in legal maintenance.

Contention

While the bill did not face considerable opposition during the legislative process, there can be a point of contention regarding the sheer volume of similar bills introduced each session to correct and update existing laws. Critics argue that this practice can obscure more pressing legislative issues that require attention and resources. Nevertheless, supporters contend that well-maintained statutes strengthen the rule of law and promote public trust in the legislative process.