Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB4201

Caption

Relating to a feasibility study on the colocation of federal and state motor vehicle inspection facilities at ports of entry.

Impact

If executed, the study will evaluate the potential benefits of colocating federal and state inspection facilities, aiming to streamline operations and possibly reduce wait times for inspections at ports of entry. The feasibility study will analyze economic benefits that may arise from this initiative, potentially influencing future legislative actions and operational efficiencies within Texas's transportation system. The final report, due by December 1, 2022, will provide insights into necessary steps for implementation and any recommendations for further legislative actions.

Summary

House Bill 4201 pertains to conducting a feasibility study on the colocation of federal and state motor vehicle inspection facilities at ports of entry in Texas. The bill directs the Texas A&M Transportation Institute to collaborate with the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to examine the viability of these colocated facilities for the inspection of commercial vehicles. The study encompasses past efforts, current practices, wait times, and perspectives from various stakeholders regarding the advantages and disadvantages of this setup.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB4201 have been generally supportive, with recognition of the efficiency and potential economic benefits that can stem from a coordinated inspection approach. Stakeholders are hopeful that the outcome of the study could lead to significant improvements in vehicle inspection processes and enhance the movement of goods across the state. However, some concerns remain about the feasibility of aligning federal and state requirements effectively.

Contention

One area of contention surrounding the bill may stem from the varying perspectives on how effective a colocated facility would be in practice. While proponents emphasize improved efficiency and reduced wait times, critics may question the cost implications, the potential for bureaucratic challenges, and whether federal and state inspections can be seamlessly integrated under one facility. Ultimately, the findings of the feasibility study will shape the discussion on this matter and guide future legislative and operational decisions.

Companion Bills

TX SB1907

Same As Relating to a feasibility study on the colocation of federal and state motor vehicle inspection facilities at ports of entry.

Previously Filed As

TX SB684

Relating to the inspection periods for certain motor vehicles; increasing certain fees.

TX HB3297

Relating to the elimination of regular mandatory vehicle safety inspections for noncommercial vehicles and the imposition of replacement fees.

TX HB4420

Relating to the elimination of regular mandatory vehicle safety inspections for noncommercial vehicles and the imposition of replacement fees.

TX SB1708

Relating to the elimination of regular mandatory vehicle safety inspections for noncommercial vehicles and the imposition of replacement fees.

TX SB1284

Relating to the portion of the fee for certain vehicle safety inspections that is remitted to the state.

TX HB5242

Relating to the portion of the fee for certain vehicle safety inspections that is remitted to the state.

TX HB1302

Relating to inspections and examinations by the Railroad Commission of Texas of certain sites and facilities conducted using unmanned aircraft.

TX HB3014

Relating to the motor vehicle safety inspection of electric vehicles.

TX HB3505

Relating to motor vehicle safety inspections; authorizing a fee.

TX HB1848

Relating to a study by the secretary of state on the feasibility of central counting stations complying with federal standards for facilities that contain sensitive information.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

TX SB174

Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

NJ S3566

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A3422

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A5181

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.