Hawaii House Bill HB217

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/25
• Refer: 1/21/25

Caption

Relating To Marijuana.

Impact

The implications of HB 217 suggest a notable shift in state policy regarding marijuana, reflecting a broader trend towards the easing of penalties associated with its use. Should this bill pass, it will amend existing laws under chapter 712 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. This will allow individuals aged 21 and older to transfer limited quantities of marijuana concentrate and products without facing stringent legal repercussions. The bill also addresses the possession of drug paraphernalia related to marijuana, significantly reducing the potential charges and aligning penalties with a public health and safety perspective rather than a strictly criminal one.

Summary

House Bill 217, which focuses on marijuana legislation, proposes significant modifications to the management and regulation of marijuana use within the state of Hawaii. The bill aims to decriminalize certain penalties associated with marijuana possession and transfer, specifically reducing the fines related to possessing or transferring small amounts of marijuana and marijuana-infused products. In particular, it establishes that a person can possess up to one ounce of marijuana or transfer this amount without remuneration, and such actions will now incur a minimal fine of $25 instead of the previous higher penalties. Additionally, individuals could opt for community service as an alternative to paying the fine, reinforcing a reformative rather than punitive approach to minor infractions.

Contention

Despite its intentions, HB 217 may encounter contention, particularly from groups that advocate for stronger controls on marijuana use or have populational health concerns. Critics may argue that the decriminalization of marijuana use could lead to increased public consumption and subsequent health-related issues. There may also be concerns regarding underage access and the potential for marijuana to be used in unsafe ways. Furthermore, opponents may express worries about local enforcement inconsistencies following the law's enactment, particularly in terms of how local authorities interpret and apply these new guidelines.