Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB916

Introduced
2/3/25  

Caption

Property; prohibiting control of certain real property by certain foreign adversaries. providing for acquisition and subsequent sale of certain property upon certain judicial determination. Effective date.

Impact

The bill mandates that any person or entity found to be in violation must divest their property interests within a specified period. Failure to comply could result in forfeiture of the property to the state. Such laws could significantly impact real estate transactions and ownership patterns, especially in agricultural regions and areas near military bases, consequently altering the state’s financial landscape concerning property values and investments.

Summary

Senate Bill 916, introduced by Senator Bergstrom, seeks to regulate foreign ownership of real property within Oklahoma, particularly targeting acquisitions by entities or individuals from 'foreign adversary nations.' This legislation defines parameters around what constitutes a foreign adversary and specifically prohibits such entities from owning agricultural land or property within five miles of military installations. The bill further establishes a registration process for existing property interests that may be considered in violation of these new restrictions.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB916 is likely to encompass concerns regarding property rights and the implications for individuals and businesses that may inadvertently fall within the scope of this legislation. Stakeholders could argue about the effectiveness and necessity of such prohibitive measures, balancing national security concerns against economic implications for foreign investments in local markets. Specifically, the exemptions for U.S. citizens, legal residents, and diplomatic parties might spark discussions on fairness and the potential for discriminatory practices against foreign nationals.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OK HB3125

Property; prohibiting foreign ownership of real property and agricultural land; effective date.

OK HB3077

Property; prohibiting foreign ownership of real property and agricultural land; effective date.

OK SB464

Property; prohibiting certain ownership of land through business entity or trust; creating a felony offense for certain violations. Effective date.

OK SB464

Property; prohibiting certain ownership of land through business entity or trust; creating a felony offense for certain violations. Effective date.

OK SB2026

Ad valorem tax; providing property tax credit for certain expenses or reduction in fair cash value of property resulting from certain nuisances. Effective date.

OK SB1051

Property; prohibiting certain ownership of land through business entity or trust. Effective date.

OK SB1051

Property; prohibiting certain ownership of land through business entity or trust. Effective date.

OK HB3961

Ad valorem tax; defining terms; providing assessment percentage ratio for certain property; effective date.

OK SB1769

Campaign finance; prohibiting certain contributions from foreign principal to certain persons or for certain purposes; prohibiting acceptance of certain contributions. Effective date.

OK SB1053

Fraud; prohibiting certain acts to wrongfully transfer real property; creating felony offense; establishing punishment. Effective date.

Similar Bills

HI HB1965

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

HI SB149

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

LA SB359

Provides for civil forfeiture reform. (8/1/22)

CA AB2584

Single-family residential real property: corporate entity: ownership.

UT SB0065

Asset Forfeiture Amendments

HI HB126

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

KS HB2606

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, requiring courts to make a finding that forfeiture is not excessive, restricting actions prior to commencement of forfeiture proceedings, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence and authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants.

AZ HB2324

Forfeiture; digital assets; reserve fund