New billboards statewide moratorium establishment and existing billboards nonconforming uses declaration provision
Impact
Should SF485 be enacted, it would have a significant impact on local governments and existing billboard owners. State agencies and political subdivisions would be prohibited from approving new billboards, which would effectively freeze billboard advertising growth across the state. Existing billboards would be categorized as nonconforming uses, meaning they would not be subject to termination by amortization, thus limiting local governments' power to remove them through policy changes. This bill could ultimately alter the landscape of advertising and development in Minnesota, especially in tourist-heavy areas.
Summary
SF485 establishes a statewide moratorium on the issuance of new billboard permits. It intends to protect Minnesota's natural beauty and appeal as a tourist destination by reducing the visual clutter associated with billboards. The bill defines billboards broadly and makes no distinction based on ownership or location of the advertised business, ensuring that existing billboards remain nonconforming uses under local ordinances. This approach aligns with legislative findings which emphasize the importance of tourism to the Minnesota economy and the perceived negative impact of billboards on the state's scenery.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SF485 appears to be favorable among legislators concerned with environmental aesthetics and economic growth through tourism. Supporters have likely framed the bill as a necessary step to preserve Minnesota's natural environment, which they believe is a key factor in attracting visitors to the state. However, potential opposition may arise from those in the advertising industry or property owners who rely on billboard revenue, indicating a conflict between economic interests and environmental concerns.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the balance between tourism promotion and the rights of property owners who may wish to utilize billboards for advertising. Critics may argue that the moratorium could stifle advertising opportunities and limit property rights. Additionally, questions may arise regarding how strictly the nonconforming status of existing billboards will be enforced and the implications for local governance in managing their aesthetics and community character.