Statewide moratorium on new billboards established, and existing billboards nonconforming uses declared.
Impact
The bill not only prohibits new billboards from being established but also classifies existing billboards as nonconforming uses. This means that while existing billboards can remain, there are restrictions on their modifications or expansions. Consequently, local municipalities will not have the authority to issue permits for new billboards, ensuring a consistent approach across the state regarding billboard regulation. The intention behind this measure is to preserve Minnesota's aesthetic values while simultaneously supporting its tourism industry.
Summary
House File 3320 establishes a statewide moratorium on the construction of new billboards in Minnesota. This legislation stems from legislative findings that highlight the adverse impact of billboards on the state's natural beauty and tourism appeal. The bill recognizes that Minnesota is renowned for its scenic landscapes, and the proliferation of billboards detracts from this allure, which could hinder tourist attraction and economic benefits derived from tourism-related activities.
Contention
While proponents of HF3320 praise it for protecting the environment and promoting tourism, critics may argue this law limits property rights and the ability of businesses to advertise effectively. Some stakeholders in the advertising and business community may voice concerns about the economic impacts of such a moratorium, arguing that it could hinder small businesses relying on outdoor advertising for visibility. Thus, discussions surrounding the bill could center on the balance between preserving the natural environment and supporting economic activity through advertising channels.