Kansas Senate Bill SB44

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/25
• Refer: 1/22/25
• Report Pass: 2/17/25
• Engrossed: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Report Pass: 3/12/25
• Enrolled: 4/10/25
• Passed: 4/10/25

Caption

Declaring antisemitism and antisemitic acts to be against public policy and establishing a statutory definition of such terms.

Impact

The enactment of SB44 will serve to reinforce existing anti-discrimination laws and provide a framework for educators and law enforcement to acknowledge and address antisemitism as a serious social issue. By declaring antisemitism against public policy, the state aims to create a safer and more inclusive environment for Jewish individuals in Kansas. The bill is designed to be in accordance with First Amendment rights, ensuring that it does not infringe upon free speech or religious expression. However, it may shift how schools and universities manage incidents of antisemitism, increasing their accountability and potentially leading to changes in curricula designed to reflect anti-discrimination values.

Summary

Senate Bill 44 seeks to establish a clear public policy against antisemitism in the state of Kansas. The bill defines antisemitism in accordance with the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's working definition, including various forms of hate and discrimination against Jewish individuals and communities. It specifically targets actions such as promoting violence or harassment against Jewish people, as well as allowing antisemitic content in educational programs, thereby emphasizing the importance of protecting Jewish students, faculty, and our institutions from such behavior. The scope of the bill encompasses public educational institutions and law enforcement agencies, effectively asserting a state-level commitment to combatting antisemitism.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment regarding SB44 appears largely positive, as there is a broad agreement on the need to combat antisemitism and promote tolerance within the state. Supporters argue that the bill will enhance understanding and awareness of antisemitism, thereby fostering a more inclusive society. Nevertheless, there may be concerns around the definition of antisemitism, particularly in how it may intersect with free speech debates, which could lead to polarized discussions among those who prioritize civil liberties over regulatory measures.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding SB44 lies in the interpretation of antisemitism and its implications for educational freedom and speech. Critics may argue that the bill could lead to censorship or stifle academic freedom, especially if educational content is scrutinized for potential antisemitic undertones. Furthermore, the reliance on a non-legally binding definition may invite challenges regarding its application in educational settings, raising questions about the balance between protecting against hate and preserving freedom of expression.