Hawaii Senate Bill SB1508

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 1/27/25
• Report Pass: 2/27/25
• Engrossed: 3/4/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Report Pass: 4/3/25
• Enrolled: 4/4/25
• Chaptered: 4/23/25
• Passed: 4/23/25

Caption

Relating To Statutory Revision: Amending Or Repealing Various Provisions Of The Hawaii Revised Statutes Or The Session Laws Of Hawaii For The Purposes Of Correcting Errors And References, Clarifying Language, Or Deleting Obsolete Or Unnecessary Provisions.

Impact

The implications of SB1508 on state laws include the potential for significant improvements in the clarity and accessibility of the legal texts. By removing redundant or outdated language, state agencies and citizens can navigate the laws with greater ease and understanding. Additionally, the bill could facilitate more effective governance, as a clearer legal framework may reduce confusion regarding compliance and enforcement of the laws. Furthermore, this legislative revision could lead to reduced costs for the state in managing legal documents and processes.

Summary

Senate Bill 1508 seeks to amend or repeal various provisions of the Hawaii Revised Statutes and the session laws of Hawaii. The primary aim of this bill is to correct historical errors, update references, clarify ambiguous language, and eliminate obsolete and unnecessary statutory provisions. By addressing these areas, the bill intends to streamline the legal framework of state laws, making it more user-friendly and efficient for both governmental and private sectors. Such statutory revisions are critical for ensuring that legislation remains relevant and functional in changing societal and legal contexts.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1508 appears to be generally positive among legislative bodies focused on legal and procedural improvements. Lawmakers typically support efforts that enhance the legislative framework and streamline processes. However, as with any statutory revision, there may be concerns from specific stakeholders regarding how amendments could affect existing rights or obligations embedded in the statutes, particularly for those with vested interests in certain legal protections or provisions that may be altered or removed.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding SB1508 might arise from interested parties who feel that certain provisions slated for removal could still hold relevance. There is a potential for pushback from advocacy groups or individuals concerned about the consequences of repealing protections that they believe are necessary, albeit outdatedly framed. It will be essential for lawmakers to address these points of contention thoughtfully to ensure that the revisions made do not unintentionally remove important safeguards or rights.