Kansas House Bill HB2112

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/25
• Refer: 1/28/25
• Report Pass: 2/14/25

Caption

Requiring water supply system and wastewater treatment facility operator certification examination fees to not exceed the costs for such exams and eliminating the certification of operators through correspondence courses.

Impact

If enacted, HB2112 would have a significant impact on the regulatory landscape governing water supply and wastewater facilities. By enforcing a cap on examination fees, the bill aims to make certification more accessible for new operators, which could alleviate financial barriers that currently deter potential candidates. Furthermore, the requirement for classroom instruction is expected to ensure that operators are trained adequately in all relevant regulations and operational procedures, potentially improving public health and safety outcomes related to water quality.

Summary

House Bill 2112 seeks to amend existing law concerning the certification of operators for water supply systems and wastewater treatment facilities in Kansas. The bill includes provisions that limit the fees for operator certification examinations to not exceed the actual cost incurred for conducting such examinations. Additionally, it eliminates the option for operators to obtain certification through correspondence courses, thus mandating that all training must occur in a classroom setting. This move responds to concerns about the quality and rigor of training programs available for water and wastewater operators.

Contention

The bill could generate debate among stakeholders in the water management sector, particularly regarding the elimination of correspondence courses. Proponents argue that in-person training is essential for proper understanding and competency in water system management. Conversely, opponents may express concerns about the increased logistical challenges and costs associated with mandatory classroom attendance, particularly for those in remote areas or those already working in the field who may prefer more flexible training options. This could result in a pushback from local utilities facing difficulties in meeting new training requirements.