Kansas House Bill HB2113

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/25
• Refer: 1/28/25
• Report Pass: 2/14/25
• Engrossed: 2/19/25
• Refer: 2/26/25
• Refer: 3/12/25

Caption

Establishing the state conservation fund and transferring $2,500,000 to such fund and providing for the enhanced transfer of moneys from the state general fund to the state water plan fund and from the state water plan fund to the water technical assistance fund and the water project grant fund.

Impact

The bill proposes significant fiscal support for water quality initiatives by enhancing appropriations dedicated to the state's water plan. This includes a detailed structure for the funding transfer to various water-related aid programs, such as the water technical assistance fund and the water projects grant fund. The funding allocations aim to ensure effective management and development of water resources, which are critical for agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability in Kansas.

Summary

House Bill 2113 seeks to enhance the financial mechanisms for water conservation efforts by establishing a state conservation fund to match federal funding for soil conservation districts. Effective July 1, 2025, the bill mandates the transfer of $5,000,000 annually from the state general fund to this conservation fund, with an intention to support domestic water quality sampling and other conservation initiatives. The legislative intent is to bolster existing conservation efforts using a matching scheme of $2 in state funds for every $1 in non-state or private funds provided during program implementation.

Contention

Amendments brought forth by HB2113 also foresee the sunset of the water technical assistance fund and the water projects grant fund by July 1, 2028. This proposal has raised discussions around the long-term implications of relying on state funding for conservation programs, particularly regarding local autonomy in managing water resources. Critics may argue that while initial funding appears beneficial, the sunset provision might jeopardize ongoing conservation initiatives by limiting future financial resources. Additionally, the focus on matching funds introduces a reliance on private entities, which may not appeal to all stakeholders, particularly those concerned with equitable access to resources and support.