Tennessee House Bill HB0667

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Refer: 3/11/25
• Refer: 3/26/25
• Refer: 4/1/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Chaptered: 5/15/25
• Passed: 5/15/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 11; Title 13; Title 20; Title 28; Title 39; Title 49; Title 54; Title 55; Title 59; Title 62; Title 64; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67; Title 68 and Title 69, relative to waste management.

Impact

The establishment of this advisory task force signifies a significant step towards a more systematic approach to waste management within Tennessee. By allowing for expert input and thorough examination of current practices, the task force is expected to devise best practices and recommendations for waste disposition. This could lead to new policies and amendments to existing regulations, strengthening the state's capacity to manage waste effectively and responsibly.

Summary

House Bill 0667 aims to address issues related to waste management in Tennessee by creating an advisory task force specifically focused on solid waste. The task force will be comprised of various stakeholders, including members of the legislature and individuals with expertise in solid waste management processes. This initiative is intended to improve the state's handling of solid waste through innovative approaches that include landfilling, recycling, incineration, and energy production, thereby potentially enhancing environmental sustainability and community health.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 0667 appears to be positive, with support coming from various stakeholders who recognize the need for improved waste management practices. Proponents see the task force as a proactive measure toward enhancing environmental practices and addressing the pressing need for sustainable waste solutions. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential bureaucracy involved in implementing such a task force and whether it will result in meaningful changes.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, it is not without contention. Critics may argue about the implications of expanded government involvement in waste management. There is a concern that bureaucratic processes could slow down decision-making and potentially complicate already established practices. Additionally, the effectiveness of the task force will depend on the quality of the experts appointed and their ability to coordinate across various sectors, which may become a point of contention as stakeholders navigate potential differences in policy priorities.