Texas House Bill HB2123

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/14/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 192; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The bill's passage is projected to have significant impacts on state laws regarding local self-governance and utility management. By creating a municipal utility district, local government services can be streamlined. However, this may also raise concerns among residents about the potential imposition of new taxes and the management of public funds. The district will be governed by a board of elected directors, ensuring some level of local representation and accountability. Additionally, any project that involves road construction will require the approval of the municipalities or counties involved, which adds another layer of oversight.

Summary

House Bill 2123 establishes the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 192, aimed at providing essential public services and infrastructure improvements in the region. The bill grants the newly created district the authority to impose taxes, issue bonds for financing utility services, and undertake road construction projects. Specifically, the district's responsibilities include the design, acquisition, and improvement of paved roads and effective storm drainage systems, which are essential for managing urban development in Fort Bend County. These measures are aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents while promoting orderly growth and development.

Contention

While proponents argue that HB 2123 will improve infrastructure and create a well-managed utility district, some opposition may arise regarding the appropriation of land through the exercise of eminent domain, as well as the financial implications of imposing new taxes. Critics may express concerns about the district's authority to acquire land necessary for road projects and the potential impact on local property rights. The need for consent from municipalities for significant actions like tax imposition or bond issuance also serves to mitigate opposition, but could introduce delays in urgent infrastructure improvements.