Alabama Senate Bill SB114

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/5/25
• Refer: 2/5/25
• Report Pass: 4/9/25
• Engrossed: 4/10/25
• Engrossed: 4/14/25
• Refer: 4/15/25
• Report Pass: 4/22/25
• Enrolled: 4/29/25
• Passed: 5/6/25

Caption

FY2025 ETF Advancement and Technology Supplemental Appropriation Bill

Impact

By appropriating funds for local education agencies, SB114 seeks to develop regional career technology centers, addressing the growing need for skilled workers in the state while aiming to improve educational outcomes. Grants made available through this bill are intended for capital outlay and equipment, as well as professional development services. The bill also reappropriates unspent funds from the previous fiscal year to further support educational initiatives, ensuring that the allocated resources effectively reach their intended beneficiaries in a timely manner.

Summary

SB114 aims to provide supplemental appropriations from the Education Trust Fund Advancement and Technology Fund for fiscal year 2025. The total appropriation is approximately $1.25 billion, which includes allocations for public institutions of higher education and various local educational entities across Alabama. The significant allocation of $807,866,080 is directed to the Department of Education to support initiatives within the state’s educational framework. This bill is structured to enhance the financial resources available to education facilities, thereby aiming to bolster curriculum improvements and technological advancements in education.

Sentiment

The sentiment toward SB114 appears to be generally positive, especially among educators and advocates for educational enhancement. Proponents argue that this funding will significantly improve the resources and facilities available to students and educators alike, fostering an environment conducive to learning and skill development. However, some discussions may revolve around the equitable distribution of these funds and the potential competitive disparity between larger and smaller school districts.

Contention

Despite the overall support for increased funding, there are concerns regarding the potential complexities involved in the allocation process. For example, the bill stipulates that grant proposals must be submitted collaboratively by at least two local education agencies, which may create challenges for smaller or less-resourced districts in accessing these funds. The necessity for local superintendents to be notified of funding opportunities and changes in appropriations may also lead to conversations on transparency and communication between state and local educational bodies.