Urging the U.S. Department of State and the United States Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission to take appropriate action to ensure that Mexico complies with the 1944 Treaty regarding shared water resources.
Impact
The passing of SCR13 is significant as it underscores the need for federal attention to this pressing issue. It urges the U.S. Department of State and the International Boundary and Water Commission to take necessary actions to enforce treaty compliance. The bill reflects a crucial understanding of the interconnectedness of urban and agricultural demands for water within Texas and may prompt negotiations or actions at the federal level to ensure compliance with international agreements, thereby safeguarding Texas' water resources and the economy dependent on them.
Summary
SCR13, a Senate Concurrent Resolution, addresses the significant non-compliance of Mexico with the 1944 Treaty regarding water delivery from the Rio Grande, which is crucial for both municipal and agricultural needs in Texas. The treaty stipulates that Mexico must deliver a minimum amount of water to the U.S. under various conditions; however, Mexico has consistently failed to meet these obligations, currently owing nearly a million acre-feet in arrears. This non-compliance poses serious risks to Texas, primarily when the state experiences drought conditions, impacting water reserves and the livelihood of many Texans who rely on this water for their daily needs and agricultural production.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SCR13 appears predominantly supportive among Texas legislators, recognizing the urgent need for federal action on this matter. The discussions illustrate a shared apprehension about the consequences of continued non-compliance and a unified call for the protection of Texas' water resources. While there may be some contention regarding the effectiveness and impact of the proposed federal actions, the overall tone suggests a collaborative desire to seek remedy for the water supply challenges faced by the state.
Contention
One notable point of contention may arise from differing opinions on how best to address the breach of duty under the treaty. Some legislators argue for stricter federal enforcement and immediate action to rectify the water deficit, while others may propose more cooperative, dialogue-based approaches with Mexican authorities. Additionally, potential implications for agricultural practices and the economy could lead to debates on resource allocation and conservation strategies within Texas.
Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected
Water Code
Chapter 5. Texas Commission On Environmental Quality
Section: 001
Chapter 51. Water Control And Improvement Districts
Identical
Urging the U.S. Department of State and the United States Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission to take appropriate action to ensure that Mexico complies with the 1944 Treaty regarding shared water resources.
Reaffirming an unwavering commitment to the shrimping industry and urging the Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce to issue a fishery resource disaster determination for fisheries along the Gulf of Mexico.
Relating to the functions of the Texas Water Development Board and continuation and functions of the State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Advisory Committee.
Relating to the transfer of functions relating to the economic regulation of water and sewer service from the Public Utility Commission of Texas and the Office of Public Utility Counsel to the Water Public Utility Commission and the Office of Water Public Utility Counsel; creating a criminal offense.