Relating to a requirement that the ballot for an election to amend the state constitution include an estimate of the cost to the state of the proposed amendment.
Impact
The implementation of SB1192 would change the way voters receive information about constitutional amendments. By ensuring that a cost estimate accompanies each proposed amendment on the ballot, the bill seeks to empower voters to make more informed decisions. This could lead to increased awareness of the potential fiscal impact on state resources, shaping future voting behaviors and possible outcomes of such elections.
Summary
SB1192 introduces a requirement for the ballot in elections regarding constitutional amendments to include an estimate of the anticipated cost to the state if the amendment is approved. This bill aims to enhance transparency and inform voters about the financial implications of the amendments they are voting on. The proposal mandates that the Secretary of State prepare a cost estimate for inclusion on the ballot, potentially using assistance from the Legislative Budget Board.
Contention
While the bill has strong backing for its intention to improve transparency, some critics may raise concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the cost estimates provided. Determining the what the true financial implications of proposed amendments can be complex, and the role of the Legislative Budget Board in preparing these estimates may also be scrutinized. Questions could arise over potential biases or interpretations of the data, as well as the timing and relevance of these estimates in relation to election cycles.
Identical
Relating to a requirement that the ballot for an election to amend the state constitution include an estimate of the fiscal impact to the state of the proposed amendment.
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring elections on proposed amendments to the Texas Constitution to be held in November of even-numbered years.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to require that future constitutional amendments become effective only if approved by a majority of the voters in at least three-fourths of the counties of the state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the secretary of state to be elected by the qualified voters at a general election instead of appointed by the governor.