California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB578

Introduced
2/12/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Engrossed
5/19/25  
Refer
5/20/25  
Refer
5/28/25  
Report Pass
6/12/25  
Refer
6/12/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/3/25  
Report Pass
7/15/25  

Caption

Food delivery platforms: customer service.

Impact

If approved, AB 578 will modify existing laws by amending the Business and Professions Code, ensuring that food delivery platforms are required to offer full refunds for undelivered or incorrect orders. Moreover, it stipulates that platforms must disclose detailed information about the service costs to both consumers and food facilities. This represents a significant shift in how these businesses are required to operate, potentially improving customer satisfaction and trust in the food delivery sector.

Summary

Assembly Bill 578, introduced by Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan, establishes clearer guidelines for food delivery platforms regarding customer service and payment practices. It prohibits these platforms from charging customers prices exceeding those listed by the food facilities and rejects retaining tips or gratuities meant for delivery personnel. Additionally, the bill mandates enhanced transparency in pricing through itemized breakdowns of costs, thereby aiming to protect consumer interests and improve service accountability.

Sentiment

There is a notable sense of support for AB 578 among consumer advocacy groups, which view the bill as a necessary step toward ensuring fair treatment for both consumers and delivery personnel. Proponents argue that the increase in transparency and accountability could foster a healthier environment in the gig economy. Critics, however, may voice concerns over the feasibility of compliance for smaller delivery platforms and the potential for increased operational costs.

Contention

Key points of contention around AB 578 revolve around its enforcement and implications for service flexibility. While supporters assert that enforcing strict refund policies would enhance consumer trust, opponents may argue that the financial burden could lead to higher delivery fees or impact service speed negatively. The balance between consumer protection and business viability is likely to be a central theme in discussions as the bill progresses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB502

Food delivery platforms: disclosure.

CA AB375

Food delivery platforms: disclosure of delivery drivers’ identity.

CA SB1524

Consumers Legal Remedies Act: advertisements: restaurant, bar, and other food services.

CA SB495

Alcoholic beverages: deliveries: off-sale retail licenses and consumer delivery service permits.

CA AB50

Public utilities: timely service: customer energization.

CA AB8

Ticket sellers.

CA AB427

Otay Mesa East Toll Facility Act: alternative project delivery method.

CA AB2863

Automatic renewal and continuous service offers.

CA AB1849

Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act: services and repairs: travel trailers and motor homes.

Similar Bills

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB502

Food delivery platforms: disclosure.

CA AB286

Food delivery: purchase prices and tips.

CA AB375

Food delivery platforms: disclosure of delivery drivers’ identity.