California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB375

Introduced
2/1/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Introduced
2/1/23  
Introduced
2/1/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
1/3/24  
Report Pass
1/3/24  
Report Pass
1/3/24  
Refer
1/4/24  
Refer
1/4/24  
Report Pass
1/9/24  
Report Pass
1/9/24  
Report Pass
1/9/24  
Engrossed
1/12/24  
Engrossed
1/12/24  
Refer
1/12/24  
Refer
1/12/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/15/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/15/24  
Report Pass
6/4/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Report Pass
6/4/24  
Report Pass
6/17/24  
Refer
6/4/24  
Refer
6/4/24  
Enrolled
6/27/24  
Report Pass
6/17/24  
Report Pass
6/17/24  
Chaptered
7/15/24  
Enrolled
6/27/24  
Enrolled
6/27/24  
Chaptered
7/15/24  
Passed
7/15/24  

Caption

Food delivery platforms: disclosure of delivery drivers’ identity.

Impact

The bill modifies existing business regulations under the Fair Food Delivery Act of 2020. It specifically addresses the communication process between food delivery platforms, food facilities, and consumers, ensuring that delivery personnel are more identifiable to customers. Platforms will be exempt from this requirement if the food facility uses its own delivery personnel or if orders are made through means not involving the platform itself. This adjustment is expected to strengthen consumer trust and accountability across food delivery services.

Summary

Assembly Bill 375, known as the Food Delivery Platforms: Disclosure of Delivery Drivers' Identity Act, introduces a new requirement for food delivery platforms operating in California. Effective March 1, 2025, this legislation mandates that platforms disclose the first name and photograph of the delivery driver to customers at the time they are notified their order is on the way. This measure aims to enhance transparency and safety for consumers using these platforms, which have become increasingly popular in recent years.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 375 is generally positive among consumer advocacy groups, who argue that the bill enhances safety and accountability in the food delivery industry. They praise the initiative for ensuring that customers are aware of who is delivering their orders, which proponents believe may deter potential misconduct. However, some legislative opponents have raised concerns about the implications for privacy and the operational burdens this may place on food delivery platforms.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, AB 375 has faced some contention regarding the balance between transparency for consumers and the privacy rights of delivery drivers. Critics argue that publicizing drivers' identities could expose them to harassment or privacy breaches, especially if they are not operating under the protection of the employer's liability. This ongoing debate highlights the difficulties in regulating new gig economy business models while accounting for both consumer safety and worker privacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB502

Food delivery platforms: disclosure.

CA AB578

Food delivery platforms: customer service.

CA AB1444

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB286

Food delivery: purchase prices and tips.

LA SB417

Provides relative to the delivery of alcoholic beverages. (8/1/22)