West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

West Virginia Senate Bill SB468

Introduced
2/14/25  

Caption

Establishing WV Defend the Guard Act

Impact

If enacted, SB468 would significantly affect how the National Guard operates in West Virginia, particularly in the context of federal military engagement. The requirement for an official declaration of war would mean that state troops could not be dispatched based on unilateral decisions by the Executive Branch. This regulatory measure aims to protect the state's rights and uphold the intention of the Constitution regarding war powers, which proponents argue has been compromised over the past decades as military actions have occurred without formal declarations of war.

Summary

Senate Bill 468, known as the 'Defend the Guard Act', aims to amend the West Virginia Code to require an official declaration of war by the United States Congress before members of the West Virginia National Guard can be released from state control to participate in active-duty combat. The bill emphasizes the constitutional argument that Congress holds the exclusive power to declare war, which has been historically overshadowed by the Executive Branch's actions. By reinstating legislative authority over military engagement decisions, this bill seeks to restore a balance of power and ensure accountability in military deployments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB468 appears to be largely supportive among those advocating for state rights and a return to constitutional principles. Proponents of the bill express concern about the current state of affairs in which Congress has not declared war for over 70 years while military forces have been repeatedly engaged abroad. However, this view is contrasted by opposing sentiments from those who argue that such stipulations could hinder military readiness and responsiveness to emerging threats, potentially leaving the state and nation at risk in times of crisis.

Contention

The contention arises from the perceived overreach of the federal government and the implications for the National Guard’s role in state and national defense. Supporters of SB468 assert that the bill not only reaffirms state sovereignty but also encourages a constitutional deliberation process concerning military action. Critics, however, fear that this could complicate mobilization efforts and question the ability of the state to act promptly in defense scenarios without the outlined procedures under federal law. This highlights a fundamental debate over the balance between state autonomy and national security.

Companion Bills

WV HB2591

Similar To Defend the Guard Act

Previously Filed As

WV HB2155

Defend the Guard Act

WV HB5278

Defend the Guard Act

WV SB291

WV Volunteer State Defense Guard Act

WV SB587

WV Volunteer State Defense Guard Act

WV HB5515

Establishing pilot program for Public Guardian Ad Litem Services

WV HCR72

Affirming the sovereign right of the State of West Virginia to nullify un-Constitutional acts

WV HB3254

Establishing the Hershel “Woody” Williams State Military Funeral Honor Guard

WV SB710

Establishing Welcome Home Grant Program

WV HB5525

To revise and update all provisions of state code to relating to the West Virginia State Guard

WV HB2421

The Campus Self Defense Act

Similar Bills

US SB2773

Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act

US SB1879

Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act

CA SCR161

The First Continental Congress.

NJ AR154

Urges Congress to provide for joint session at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in honor of semiquincentennial of Declaration of Independence.

DC B25-0825

Removal of the Highway Plan and Building Restriction Line from Lot 9 in Square 5914 along the West Side of Congress Street, S.E., S.O. 22-01642, Act of 2024

CA AJR27

Convention of states for proposing an amendment to the United States Constitution: federal balanced budget.

TX SJR1

Urging the Congress of the United States to propose and submit to the states for ratification a federal balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States and, in the event that Congress does not submit such an amendment on or before December 31, 2011, applying to Congress to call a convention for the specific and exclusive purpose of proposing an amendment to that constitution to provide, in the absence of a national emergency and on a two-thirds vote of Congress, for a federal balanced budget and requesting that the legislatures of each of the several states that compose the United States apply to Congress to call a convention to propose such an amendment.

US SR107

A resolution recognizing the expiration of the Equal Rights Amendment proposed by Congress in March 1972, and observing that Congress has no authority to modify a resolution proposing a constitutional amendment after the amendment has been submitted to the States or after the amendment has expired.