California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB459

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Engrossed
5/15/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/15/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
6/17/25  
Refer
6/18/25  
Refer
6/26/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  

Caption

Peace officers: confidential communications: exceptions: group peer support services.

Impact

The passage of SB 459 is expected to have significant implications for law enforcement practices concerning mental health support. By allowing such disclosures under specific circumstances yet ensuring confidentiality, the bill aims to provide a balance between the need for transparency in juvenile cases and the protection of the mental well-being of law enforcement personnel. This nuanced approach recognizes the unique stresses faced by law enforcement and the importance of peer support in managing mental health crises.

Summary

Senate Bill 459, introduced by Senator Grayson, seeks to amend the Government Code to enhance confidentiality protections for communications between law enforcement personnel and peer support team members. The bill expands the existing Law Enforcement Peer Support and Crisis Referral Services Program by permitting disclosures of confidential communications in juvenile delinquency proceedings while maintaining protections for other communications. Additionally, it strengthens the rights of law enforcement personnel to refuse disclosure of confidential exchanges made during group peer support services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 459 is supportive amongst those who prioritize the mental health of law enforcement officials. Advocates argue that enhancing confidentiality is crucial for encouraging officers to seek help without fear of repercussions. However, there are concerns about maintaining the integrity of the judicial process, particularly regarding how the bill’s provisions may impact juvenile justice proceedings. This tension reflects a broader societal discourse on balancing mental health needs with public safety concerns.

Contention

A notable point of contention in the discussions surrounding SB 459 is the balance between confidentiality and accountability in law enforcement. Critics fear that expanding confidentiality could shield problematic behavior from scrutiny while proponents believe that it will foster a healthier work environment, leading to better long-term outcomes for officers and the communities they serve. This debate is indicative of the complex dynamics at play in reforming support systems for first responders in the face of increasing mental health crises.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2859

Emergency medical technicians: peer support.

CA AB1843

Emergency ambulance employees.

CA SB400

Peace officers: confidentiality of records.

CA AB459

Peace officers: Attorney General: reports.

CA AB2421

Employer-employee relations: confidential communications.

CA AB1479

Pupil health: social-emotional, behavioral, and mental health supports.

CA AB1644

Medi-Cal: medically supportive food and nutrition services.

CA AB1672

In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act.

CA SB326

The Behavioral Health Services Act.

CA AB2893

The Supportive Recovery Residence Program.

Similar Bills

CA AB1116

Firefighters: peer support.

CA AB1117

Peace officers: peer support.

CA AB2859

Emergency medical technicians: peer support.

CA AB1280

Crimes: deceptive recordings.

CA AB1116

Peer Support and Crisis Referral Services Pilot Program.

CA AB2554

Correctional personnel: peer support.