California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB508

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  
Engrossed
5/27/25  
Refer
4/7/25  

Caption

Out-of-state physicians and surgeons: telehealth: license exemption.

Impact

The passage of SB 508 could significantly alter the landscape of telehealth practice in California by improving access to healthcare for patients diagnosed with cancer and other life-threatening conditions. By allowing out-of-state physicians to provide services, the bill aims to bridge gaps in care, especially for patients who may not have immediate options nearby. This amendment reflects a growing trend toward telehealth as a means to increase healthcare accessibility and could have broader implications for how states regulate medical practice across borders.

Summary

Senate Bill 508, introduced by Senator Valladares, aims to amend Section 2052.5 of the Business and Professions Code concerning the practice of telehealth by out-of-state physicians. The bill specifically allows licensed out-of-state physicians to provide telehealth services to California patients who meet certain criteria. It modifies the definition of 'eligible patients' to include those diagnosed with any stage of cancer and clarifies that patients with life-threatening conditions are not necessarily required to participate in local clinical trials to qualify for telehealth services, thereby increasing patient access to specialized care across state lines.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 508 appears to be positive among proponents of telehealth and patient advocacy groups. They view the bill as a necessary step towards expanding healthcare access in a timely manner, especially for patients with serious conditions that require quick and specialized intervention. However, concerns may arise regarding the regulatory oversight of out-of-state practitioners and the quality of care being delivered remotely.

Contention

Debate may center on the implications of allowing out-of-state physicians to practice in California without being licensed in the state. Opponents might raise concerns about the adequacy of oversight and accountability, questioning how the Medical Board of California will ensure that these physicians maintain the same standards of care as in-state providers. Additionally, the specific criteria for patient eligibility could provoke discussions regarding patient safety and the efficacy of telehealth treatments, particularly for those with severe health conditions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1369

Out-of-state physicians and surgeons: telehealth: license exemption.

CA AB765

Physicians and surgeons: medical specialty titles.

CA AB2164

Physicians and surgeons: licensure requirements: disclosure.

CA SB357

Vehicles: physician and surgeon reporting.

CA AB470

Continuing medical education: physicians and surgeons.

CA AB2860

Licensed Physicians and Dentists from Mexico programs.

CA SB358

Physicians and surgeons and podiatrists: renewal of expired licenses: payment of accrued fees.

CA SB481

Physicians and surgeons: specialty certifications and practice status: annual report.

CA AB1646

Physicians and surgeons: postgraduate training: guest rotations.

CA AB1241

Medi-Cal: telehealth.

Similar Bills

CA AB1369

Out-of-state physicians and surgeons: telehealth: license exemption.

AK SB91

Telehealth: Multidisciplinary Care Team

NH HB701

Relative to the terminal patients' right to try act.

WV SB299

Modifying WV regulations on pubertal modulation, hormonal therapy, and gender reassignment

HI SB890

Relating To Health Care.

HI HB1428

Relating To Health Care.

HI SB890

Relating To Health Care.

HI HB1428

Relating To Health Care.