Housing development projects: objective standards: campus development zone.
Impact
The bill builds on existing laws established by the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, which allows developers to submit applications that meet specified criteria for expedited municipal review. By broadening the scope of projects eligible for streamlined review, AB 893 aims to facilitate the development of housing in areas close to colleges and universities, which has been identified as crucial for addressing the student housing crisis affecting many campuses across the state. This effect is expected to bolster the availability of affordable housing for students and local faculty.
Summary
Assembly Bill 893, introduced by Assembly Member Fong, aims to address the pressing housing crisis in California by amending various sections of the Government Code related to housing development projects. It expands the eligibility for streamlined ministerial review processes for affordable and mixed-income housing projects, particularly those developed within campus development zones. The bill stipulates that local governments' reviews will be limited to the areas physically disturbed by the construction, thereby promoting faster approvals for housing projects meeting defined objective standards and affordability criteria.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 893 reflects a balance between the urgent need for housing development and the concerns of local governance. Supporters highlight the importance of swift housing construction to alleviate the shortage faced by students and residents in educational hubs. Conversely, there are apprehensions about undermining local oversight of development projects, particularly regarding adherence to community standards and environmental protections.
Contention
One notable point of contention is the bill's provision that easements for utilities or public rights-of-way will not impede a property's eligibility for ministerial review. Critics argue this provision could lead to overdevelopment without adequate local scrutiny. Additionally, the bill does not require local governments to impose increased fees or inclusionary housing requirements for eligible projects, which may spark further debates on the adequacy of returns for local communities impacted by the developments.