New York Senate Bill S05347

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/20/25

Caption

Relates to certain voidable transfers affecting a federal home loan bank including injunctions and the conduct of delinquency proceedings against insurers domiciled in this state.

Impact

The implications of this bill could significantly affect the conduct of delinquency proceedings against insurers domiciled in New York. By preventing receivers from voiding these transfers, S05347 aims to provide a more predictable and secure regulatory environment for insurers, allowing them to transact with federal home loan banks without the fear of retroactive claims against their financial decisions made during normal business operations. This could foster a healthier relationship between state-regulated insurers and federal institutions, potentially enhancing liquidity and financial reliability in the insurance marketplace.

Summary

Bill S05347 seeks to amend the insurance law in New York concerning specific voidable transfers related to federal home loan banks. The primary focus centers around ensuring that transfers of money or other property made by an insurer-member, under a federal home loan bank security agreement, are not voided by a receiver unless they are made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors. This amendment aims to protect certain financial transactions, thereby enhancing the stability of insurers associated with federal home loan banks during delinquency proceedings.

Contention

Points of contention surrounding this bill could stem from concerns regarding the potential for abuse that may arise if transfers are not adequately scrutinized. Critics may argue that the legislation could allow insurers to exploit this protection to evade settling legitimate creditor claims, thereby undermining the principles of accountability and transparency within the insurance industry. Additionally, the balance between regulatory oversight and operational flexibility is a critical consideration, as stakeholders assess the appropriate level of intervention needed to protect consumers while promoting a conducive environment for financial institutions.