California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1061

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Engrossed
5/19/25  
Refer
5/20/25  
Refer
5/28/25  
Report Pass
6/18/25  
Refer
6/18/25  
Report Pass
6/23/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/10/25  
Enrolled
9/8/25  

Caption

Housing developments: urban lot splits: historical resources.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1061 would significantly alter local planning and zoning laws by reducing the discretion that local agencies have in the approval of urban lot splits. Local agencies would be required to adopt objective standards necessary to maintain the historical value of designated districts while allowing for urban development. This could potentially lead to an increase in the number of housing units available, particularly in urbanized areas, which are facing housing shortages and affordability crises.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1061, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva, seeks to amend sections of the Government Code concerning land use and housing developments, specifically focusing on urban lot splits and historical resources. The bill mandates that local agencies ministerially approve certain housing developments that meet specific requirements, notably when such developments do not involve parcels located in historic districts or on the State Historic Resources Inventory. This approach aims to streamline the process of housing development approvals to address the growing demand for housing in urban areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1061 shows a division among stakeholders. Proponents, including several housing advocates and local governments, argue that the bill is a necessary step towards alleviating the housing crisis by simplifying the approval process and encouraging development where it's critically needed. Conversely, critics express concerns that this legislation could undermine local control and inadequately protect historical sites, leading to a loss of community character and heritage.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the balance between development and historic preservation. While the bill allows for simpler approvals, concerns have been raised about ensuring that local agencies can still adequately address the unique characteristics of historical properties. The debate reflects a broader conflict between the urgency of housing development and the need to preserve cultural and historical resources within urban environments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB450

Housing development: approvals.

CA SB684

Land use: streamlined approval processes: development projects of 10 or fewer residential units on urban lots under 5 acres.

CA AB2580

Historical resources.

CA AB2746

Streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments: agricultural employee housing.

CA SB423

Land use: streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments.

CA AB3116

Housing development: density bonuses: student housing developments.

CA AB1561

Housing development: Camp Fire Housing Assistance Act of 2019.

CA AB2314

Tribal housing developments: use by right: density.

CA AB1630

Planning and zoning: housing development approvals: student housing projects.

CA AB2243

Housing development projects: objective standards: affordability and site criteria.

Similar Bills

CA SB450

Housing development: approvals.

CA SB9

Housing development: approvals.

CA SB1120

Subdivisions: tentative maps.

CA SB677

Housing development: streamlined approvals.

CA SB477

Accessory dwelling units.

CA SB1123

Planning and zoning: subdivisions: ministerial review.