California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB962

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Engrossed
4/24/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
5/7/25  

Caption

Pupil safety: comprehensive school safety plans: use of smartphones.

Impact

The impact of AB 962 is significant as it amends the Education Code to clarify that school districts and charter schools must not prohibit pupil smartphone possession under certain critical circumstances, such as emergencies. This change reflects a growing recognition of smartphones' potential role in student safety and communication during crises. Furthermore, the bill requires the involvement of stakeholders, including parents and educators, in creating policies that reflect community needs, thus enhancing local governance in educational safety protocols.

Summary

Assembly Bill 962, introduced by Assembly Member Hoover, focuses on enhancing pupil safety within California schools by modifying existing regulations related to the use of smartphones. The bill emphasizes the need for public schools, grades K-12, to develop and adopt comprehensive safety plans by July 1, 2026. These plans must address the use of smartphones by students, particularly in relation to emergencies and perceived threats. The legislation seeks to promote evidence-based practices for smartphone use in educational environments while ensuring pupil safety and well-being.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB 962 appears positive, particularly among proponents who argue that flexibility in smartphone use during emergencies enhances student safety. The requirement for community involvement in policy development is also viewed favorably as it aligns with broader trends of stakeholder engagement in educational reform. However, concerns may arise regarding how schools will enforce these regulations and the potential for varying interpretations across districts, which could lead to inconsistencies.

Contention

While AB 962 has strong support, there are points of contention related to the practical implications of its enforcement. Critics may express concerns about how policies will be standardized across diverse school districts and whether all communities can effectively participate in developing their safety plans. The potential for misuse or misunderstanding of the regulations regarding smartphone use could also present challenges in maintaining a learning environment conducive to education while safeguarding pupil rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB3216

Pupils: use of smartphones.

CA SB323

Comprehensive school safety plans: individualized safety plans.

CA SB1283

Pupils: use of social media.

CA AB2968

School safety and fire prevention: fire hazard severity zones: comprehensive school safety plans: communication and evacuation plans.

CA AB1858

Comprehensive school safety plans: active shooters: armed assailants: drills.

CA AB3199

Comprehensive school safety plans: schoolsite councils.

CA AB1299

School safety: school resource officers: school police officers: school safety plans.

CA AB2887

School safety plans: medical emergency procedures.

CA SB671

School safety plans: dangerous, violent, or unlawful activities.

CA AB960

School safety: web-based or app-based school safety programs.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.