Pupil safety: comprehensive school safety plans: use of smartphones.
Impact
The amendment will require school districts and charter schools to actively engage with stakeholders, including parents, educators, and pupils, to formulate policies that reflect community needs. The measure suggests that one of the significant components of these policies should be evidence-based approaches to smartphone use that bolster pupil learning and well-being. However, the bill allows for exceptions where smartphones may be used during emergencies or in specific educational contexts, which underscores the need for thoughtful policy development.
Summary
Assembly Bill 962, introduced by Assembly Member Hoover, aims to amend Section 48901.7 of the Education Code concerning pupil safety and the use of smartphones in schools. The bill establishes that all public schools must develop and adopt policies by July 1, 2026, to limit or prohibit smartphone use by pupils during school hours or while under supervision. These policies are intended to enhance the safety and educational environment for students, aligning with the broader intention of maintaining effective school safety plans.
Sentiment
Overall, there is a proactive sentiment surrounding AB 962, with supporters highlighting the importance of maintaining a focused learning environment free from distractions. Proponents believe that regulating smartphone use can lead to improved academic performance and pupil safety. Conversely, concerns may arise regarding the practical implications of enforcing these regulations and the balance between necessary access to technology and maintaining discipline in school settings.
Contention
One of the notable points of contention related to AB 962 is the challenge of creating a one-size-fits-all policy applicable across diverse school settings. Critics argue that strict prohibitions might not suit all educational contexts, especially in cases where technology aids learning. This debate reflects broader issues surrounding the role of technology in education and highlights differing opinions on balancing safety with the benefits of smartphone accessibility within academic environments.
Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another prohibited in circumstances, cause of action provided to individuals when geolocation information and other smartphone data has been recorded or shared.