Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF2912

Introduced
3/24/25  

Caption

Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another prohibition in certain circumstances

Impact

If enacted, SF2912 would significantly enhance protection for individuals against unauthorized surveillance and data sharing practices. It introduces legal consequences for those who violate these provisions, allowing individuals whose data has been improperly accessed to seek damages in court, including financial compensation for mental anguish. The bill aims to empower individuals over their digital footprints, thus fostering greater accountability for software developers and companies that provide monitoring applications.

Summary

SF2912 is a proposed bill in Minnesota that seeks to address concerns around geolocation tracking and smartphone monitoring without consent. The bill prohibits the unauthorized tracking or sharing of an individual's geolocation information, text messages, and access to microphone or camera data from smartphones. It sets forth specific requirements for software and applications that track or record such information, mandating conspicuous notifications, two-factor authentication, and explicit consent from device owners. This legislative move comes amid growing public awareness and concern regarding personal data privacy in the digital era.

Contention

The introduction of this bill may ignite debate regarding the balance between privacy rights and the needs of employers or agencies that might require access to such information for legitimate reasons. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary shield against potential abuses of technology, while critics may express concern over how it could hinder legitimate business practices, particularly in industries reliant on monitoring for safety or productivity. Notably, exceptions in the bill, such as those permitting parents to monitor minors or employers monitoring employees with consent, could also lead to discussions about what constitutes appropriate oversight versus invasive practices.

Companion Bills

MN HF2313

Similar To Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another person prohibited, and cause of action when violation has occurred provided.

Similar Bills

MN SF943

Geolocation and smartphone monitoring prohibition of another in certain circumstances

MN HF846

Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another prohibited in circumstances, cause of action provided to individuals when geolocation information and other smartphone data has been recorded or shared.

MN HF2313

Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another person prohibited, and cause of action when violation has occurred provided.

MA H1786

Modernizing the Massachusetts wiretap law

MA S1266

Updating the wiretap statutes in the commonwealth

MA S1128

Updating the wiretap statutes in the Commonwealth

CA AB235

Pupils: use of smartphones.

LA HB222

Regulates the manufacture, sale, and lease of telephones with respect to smartphone encryption technology