Provides that a hearing required before a judge or magistrate may adjudge a motorist in contempt for failure to comply with the court's orders regarding a conditional hardship license, and defines penalties for violation of a hardship/interlock order.
Impact
The implications of S0574 are substantial, as the bill seeks to amend existing statutes that grant local governments the authority to regulate certain areas. By centralizing regulatory power at the state level, this legislation could significantly alter how localities manage business operations, environmental policies, and community welfare measures. Supporters believe this will create a more business-friendly environment, while critics warn of the potential loss of tailored solutions that address unique local needs, particularly in underserved communities.
Summary
S0574 is a legislative proposal aimed at addressing various regulatory concerns across the state. The bill introduces specific measures regarding local control, allowing state authorities to have a more significant role in regulations that previously fell under local jurisdictions. Proponents argue that this shift is essential for maintaining uniformity in regulations, which can help businesses operate more efficiently without the burden of differing local laws. However, the bill has garnered mixed reactions, highlighting the tension between state and local governance.
Contention
Debate around S0574 has focused on the balance of power between state and local governments. Proponents, primarily from the business community and certain political factions, advocate for the bill on the grounds that less fragmented regulations will promote economic growth. Conversely, opponents argue that such centralization undermines the voices of local residents and their elected officials, potentially stifling innovation in local governance. This disagreement underscores the ongoing struggle over the appropriate scope of government power in regulating economic activity.
Notable_points
In summary, S0574 symbolizes a critical intersection of economic policy and governance philosophy. With its provisions aimed at reining in local regulatory authority, the bill not only influences economic behavior but also invites broader discussions about democracy and representation at the community level. As legislative hearings continue, the outcome will likely reflect the ongoing debate over the balance of authority in a rapidly changing economic landscape.
Requires that any person convicted of a charge of DUI or refusal, have an ignition interlock before being eligible for license reinstatement. Also permits a first-time offender to have charges dismissed.
Requires persons convicted of driving under influence or refusal to submit to chemical test, have an ignition interlock system installed in vehicle as part of sentence and to pay an assessment to pay for the systems for indigent defendants.
Increases mandatory liability coverage for retail alcoholic beverage license holders from $300,000 to $1,000,000/Prevents injured consumers of alcohol recovering damages/Increases mandatory min jail sentence for 2nd time violation of DUI of alcohol/drugs.
Extends the "lookback" period for repeat offenses involving driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs under § 31-27-2 and for repeat offenses related to failure or refusal to submit to chemical tests under § 31-27-2.1 from five to ten years.
Extends the "lookback" period for repeat offenses involving driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs under § 31-27-2 and for repeat offenses related to failure or refusal to submit to chemical tests under § 31-27-2.1 from five to ten years.
Extends the "lookback" period for repeat offenses involving driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs under § 31-27-2 and for repeat offenses related to failure or refusal to submit to chemical tests under § 31-27-2.1 from 5 years to 10 years.
Provides that a hearing required before a judge or magistrate may adjudge a motorist in contempt for failure to comply with the court's orders regarding a conditional hardship license, and defines penalties for violation of a hardship/interlock order.
Requires persons convicted of driving under influence or refusal to submit to chemical test, to have an ignition interlock system installed in vehicle as part of sentence and to pay an assessment to pay for the systems for indigent defendants.
Requires persons convicted of driving under influence or refusal to submit to chemical test, have an ignition interlock system installed in vehicle as part of sentence and to pay an assessment to pay for the systems for indigent defendants.
Requires that any person convicted of a charge of DUI or refusal, have an ignition interlock before being eligible for license reinstatement. Also permits a first-time offender to have charges dismissed.
Requires persons convicted of driving under influence or refusal to submit to chemical test, have an ignition interlock system installed in vehicle as part of sentence and to pay an assessment to pay for the interlock systems.
Requires persons convicted of driving under influence or refusal to submit to chemical test, have an ignition interlock system installed in vehicle as part of sentence and to pay an assessment to pay for the interlock systems.