Rhode Island House Bill H6211

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/9/25
• Refer: 4/9/25

Caption

Requires persons convicted of driving under influence or refusal to submit to chemical test, have an ignition interlock system installed in vehicle as part of sentence and to pay an assessment to pay for the interlock systems.

Impact

If passed, H6211 would significantly alter the sentencing guidelines for DUI offenders in Rhode Island. It strengthens the penalties for DUI convictions, ensuring that individuals can only regain their driving privileges after meeting the new requirements, including the installation of an ignition interlock device. The expected outcome is to reduce instances of repeat offenses by making it more challenging for individuals with a history of DUI to drive without supervision. Such measures aim to enhance public safety on the roads by addressing recurrent driving offenses related to alcohol and drug use.

Summary

House Bill H6211 seeks to amend existing Rhode Island laws regarding penalties for individuals convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) of intoxicating liquor or drugs. The bill mandates that any person convicted of DUI or refusal to submit to a chemical test be required to install an ignition interlock system in their vehicle. This system must be installed as part of the sentence before the individual can be eligible for reinstatement of their driving license. An additional financial component is introduced, requiring offenders to contribute to an ignition interlock system fund.

Contention

Opposition to H6211 may arise from concerns about the financial burden imposed on offenders, particularly poorer individuals who may struggle to afford the costs associated with the ignition interlock system and other court-assigned fees. Additionally, there may be arguments against the efficacy of ignition interlock devices in preventing further incidents of DUI while also questioning the fairness of imposing stringent requirements on first-time offenders versus repeat offenders. The emphasis on technology to monitor and restrict driving privileges raises questions about privacy and the effectiveness of these systems.