Iowa Senate Bill SF472

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/25
• Engrossed: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/26/25
• Refer: 5/15/25

Caption

A bill for an act relating to retention and recertification elections for public employee collective bargaining units and including effective date and applicability provisions.(Formerly SSB 1172.)

Impact

The significant reforms introduced by SF472 are expected to impact state labor law as they establish clearer guidelines for the conduct of retention elections, thereby directly affecting public employee unions in Iowa. By delineating responsibilities and timelines for both employers and the board, the bill aims to streamline the election process, which could potentially enhance the efficiency and fairness of public employee representation. However, the explicit requirement for timely submission of employee lists creates a new accountability mechanism for public employers, ensuring that they adhere to the legal framework surrounding collective bargaining.

Summary

Senate File 472 (SF472) is a legislative proposal aimed at modifying the process of retention and recertification elections for public employee collective bargaining units in Iowa. The bill mandates that prior to holding such elections, the Employment Appeal Board (the board) must issue a written notice to both the public employer and the relevant bargaining representative. This ensures that all parties are adequately informed before the elections take place, facilitating a more organized process. Furthermore, public employers are required to submit a list of eligible employees to the board within ten days of receiving this notification.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SF472 is the potential legal ramifications for public employers who fail to comply with the new requirements. The bill specifically states that it would be unlawful for public employers not to submit the required lists, and it provides a mechanism for individuals to petition the courts to compel compliance. Critics may argue that this could create an overly burdensome regulatory environment for public employers and could lead to unnecessary legal disputes. The provisions for expedited judicial review and allocation of attorney fees may also provoke discussions regarding the bill's fairness and practicality in application.