North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H318

Introduced
3/5/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/15/25  
Refer
4/15/25  
Report Pass
4/28/25  
Engrossed
4/29/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Refer
6/2/25  
Report Pass
6/4/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Report Pass
6/9/25  
Enrolled
6/10/25  
Vetoed
6/20/25  
Chaptered
7/29/25  
Override
7/29/25  

Caption

The Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act

Impact

The implementation of HB 318 is expected to significantly influence state laws concerning the detention and release of individuals charged with specific crimes, especially felonies and certain misdemeanors. By requiring jails and detention centers to inquire about an inmate's immigration status, the bill aligns local law enforcement actions more closely with federal immigration policies, potentially increasing the number of individuals handed over to federal authorities. This could impact not only the individuals affected but also the legal framework within which local jails operate regarding pretrial releases.

Summary

House Bill 318, also known as the Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act, aims to modify the eligibility criteria for the pretrial release of individuals confined in various detention facilities, particularly focusing on those who may not be legal residents or citizens of the United States. The bill mandates that when a prisoner is detained, the facility must determine their legal status and notify Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) if a detainer or administrative warrant exists for them. This change is intended to enhance immigration enforcement by ensuring that individuals subject to ICE detainers are held until ICE can take custody of them.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 318 appears to be divided along partisan lines. Proponents of the bill, largely from the Republican side, argue that it enhances public safety by ensuring that those who may have violated immigration laws do not go unmonitored after their release. On the contrary, critics, primarily from the Democratic party and various advocacy groups, contend that the bill may lead to unjust detentions, showing bias against undocumented immigrants and exacerbating fears within immigrant communities. The debates reflect broader national discussions on immigration policy and local enforcement responsibilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 318 include concerns about civil liberties, local government authority, and the potential for increased racial profiling. Critics argue that the emphasis on immigration status in determining pretrial release conditions may create an environment of fear and mistrust among immigrant populations, deterring them from seeking legal recourse or assistance. Furthermore, the bill's provisions regarding notification to ICE and the required holding period before release, which is set at two hours, raise questions about the operational burdens on local law enforcement and the ethical implications of enforcing federal immigration laws at the local level.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC H10

Require ICE Cooperation & Budget Adjustments

NC S50

Require Cooperation with ICE 2.0

NC S705

Equity in Justice Act of 2023

NC H186

Juv Just Mods/DOI Expenses/Tech Changes

NC H378

Firefighters Criminal History Record Checks

NC H748

Child Abuse and Other Criminal Law Changes

NC H834

Juvenile Justice Modifications

NC S492

Adult Correction/Law Enf. Changes

NC S409

Various Changes to Criminal and Civil Laws

NC H193

AOC Ct Changes/Amd Expunction

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.