Delaware House Bill HB36

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Engrossed: 3/27/25
• Refer: 3/27/25
• Enrolled: 6/24/25

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 2, Title 6, Title 9, Title 10, Title 14, Title 19, Title 20, Title 24, Title 25, And Title 29 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Discrimination.

Impact

The bill emphasizes that while it makes no substantive changes to existing non-discrimination laws, it is crucial for reinforcing clarity across the legal landscape. For example, it addresses discrepancies where specific entities, such as professional licensing boards, may lack comprehensive protections against discrimination based on certain classes like sexual orientation or gender identity. By aligning these provisions, HB36 aims to safeguard individuals against discrimination in various sectors such as public accommodations, housing, and employment, thereby providing a more robust framework of equality under the law.

Summary

House Bill 36 (HB36) aims to align the various non-discrimination laws in Delaware by reconciling narrow laws with broader, overarching non-discrimination statutes. It focuses on ensuring that all protected classes outlined in Delaware's broad non-discrimination laws are also represented in narrow laws pertaining to specific entities. This amendment is vital for creating consistency in the interpretation and application of non-discrimination policies, thus helping prevent legal ambiguities that may arise from incomplete or contradictory regulations.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB36 is positive among its supporters, who argue that it is a necessary step toward comprehensive equality in non-discrimination protections. Proponents believe that this alignment will not only bolster legal clarity but also help to eliminate biases and ensure equitable treatment for all individuals regardless of their background. However, some opponents may express concerns about potential over-expansion of definitions which could complicate enforcement or lead to unintended consequences regarding rights and privileges.

Contention

One notable point of contention observed during the discussions about HB36 revolves around the definitions and categories of protected classes. Critics often point out the challenge of ensuring that all relevant categories are preserved and accurately defined across both narrow and broad statutes. As the bill strives to align protections, discussions about whether certain classes should remain separate or integrated into the broader framework can surface, suggesting that ongoing dialogue will be necessary to fully address these concerns.