Hawaii Senate Bill SR122

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/12/25

Caption

Requesting The County Of Maui To Acquire All West Maui Water Systems Through Eminent Domain And To Hold Them In Trust For The Public, With Management Under The County Water System, Pursuant To The Public Trust Doctrine.

Impact

This resolution is expected to significantly impact local statutes regarding water management and public access. By pushing for the acquisition of privately held water systems, the resolution aims to reclaim control for the community, ensuring that water resources serve public rather than private interests. The move aligns with the public trust doctrine, which mandates the state to safeguard natural resources for the benefit of its residents, ultimately promoting sustainability and resilience against climate pressures affecting the region.

Summary

Senate Resolution 122 requests the County of Maui to acquire all West Maui water systems through eminent domain and to manage them as a public trust. The resolution underscores the urgent need for equitable water distribution in West Maui, which is facing mounting pressure from climate change and private control over local water resources. This initiative is seen as a response to inadequate access and management of water systems, which have been exacerbated by recent events like the 2023 Maui wildfires, indicating a critical need for a shift towards public management of water resources.

Contention

The resolution highlights a fundamental contention between private water resource management and the community's right to access and control essential services. Proponents argue that restoring public control over West Maui's water systems is essential for ensuring equitable access and protecting Native Hawaiian water rights. Critics, however, might express concerns regarding the implications of using eminent domain and the potential resistance from private entities currently controlling these resources. The broader implications of this resolution may spark debate over environmental stewardship vs. private interests within the area.