Michigan Senate Bill SB0136

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/25
• Refer: 3/12/25
• Report Pass: 3/20/25
• Refer: 3/20/25
• Report Pass: 4/16/25
• Engrossed: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25

Caption

Health: testing; notification of dense breast tissue; eliminate, and provide for other general amendments to the use of radiation machines for mammography. Amends secs. 13501, 13521, 13522 & 13523 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.13501 et seq.) & repeals secs. 13524 & 13531 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.13524 & 333.13531).

Impact

The implications of SB0136 are significant for state laws governing public health and radiation safety. By updating the licensing and operational requirements for mammography, the legislation seeks to address gaps in existing regulations that may impact the quality of care provided to patients. Enhanced training and strict compliance measures could lead to improved outcomes in breast cancer detection, aligning Michigan's health standards with best practices and federal guidelines. The repeal of outdated sections of the previous regulations also reflects an effort to modernize state legislation related to medical technology.

Summary

Senate Bill 136, also known as SB0136, proposes amendments to the Public Health Code of Michigan concerning the use of radiation machines for mammography. The bill seeks to update various sections related to the licensing and regulation of radiation machines, specifically focusing on mammography authorization. Notably, it aims to enhance safety protocols by imposing more rigorous training and performance standards for individuals operating these machines, thereby ensuring higher quality and more reliable screening processes for breast cancer detection.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB0136 appears to be positive, with support from healthcare professionals who recognize the necessity of stringent standards for mammographic practices. There are likely advocates who stress the importance of patient safety and effective cancer screening. However, potential contention may arise from concerns about the implications of administrative burdens on healthcare providers and facilities in terms of compliance costs and operational adjustments.

Contention

One point of contention in the discussions surrounding SB0136 could involve the balance between regulatory oversight and the operational flexibility of medical facilities. While proponents argue that increased standards will improve mammography quality, critics may express worries about the potential for excessive regulations that could hinder access to timely screening services for patients. Additionally, the financial impact on facilities required to meet these new standards could lead to disparities in access to mammography in under-resourced areas.