Michigan Senate Bill SB0136

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/25
• Refer: 3/12/25
• Report Pass: 3/20/25
• Refer: 3/20/25
• Report Pass: 4/16/25
• Engrossed: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Enrolled: 12/18/25
• Chaptered: 12/23/25
• Passed: 12/23/25

Caption

Health: testing; notification of dense breast tissue; eliminate, and provide for other general amendments to the use of radiation machines. Amends secs. 13501, 13521, 13522 & 13523 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.13501 et seq.) & repeals secs. 13524 & 13531 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.13524 & 333.13531).

Impact

The bill modifies existing laws related to the registration of radiation machines and the noncompliance inspection process. For facilities that do not have their machinery inspected for five consecutive years, the bill stipulates that they will not be required to pay further registration fees until the next renewal date following inspection. Additionally, it establishes a schedule of fees associated with mammography inspections, ensuring that these costs are structured to fund the regulatory processes adequately.

Summary

Senate Bill 0136 amends the 1978 Public Health Act to enhance regulations concerning the use of ionizing radiation in medical procedures, specifically mammography. It seeks to establish clearer definitions and licensing processes for devices and personnel involved in handling radioactive materials. The bill aims to ensure that facilities performing mammography are compliant with updated standards that promote patient safety and effective imaging practices, thereby enhancing public health outcomes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 0136 appears to be largely supportive among health professionals and regulatory agencies that see the bill as a necessary step towards modernizing health safety standards. However, some concerns exist regarding the potential financial burden that new fees may impose on smaller facilities, potentially leading to a debate between public health priorities and the economic realities of healthcare providers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the fees for compliance and inspections and the balance of regulatory oversight with operational flexibility for healthcare providers. These discussions echo larger themes in public health policy regarding managing costs, ensuring quality care, and addressing community health needs without placing undue burdens on health service providers.